Hand the person deciding what went wrong with one agent purchase everything a neutral party observed about it, in one signed file, with what it did not observe stated

Give a transaction hash and this assembles, at one moment and under one signature, everything this store already observed about that purchase: a fresh settlement attestation; the reconciliation of movement against an observed fixed value or declared cap (Base); the mandate you cite, its declared cap printed beside the settled amount and never enforced; the door over the seven days around the transaction — corpus rounds, any watch rows, the passport tier at the time — or not_observed, which is an answer about our books; and delivery, if you hold a launch check or this store itself was the seller, otherwise 'delivery not observed by this store' in full weight, because that is the section a dispute usually turns on and we usually do not have it. Your own account of what happened rides verbatim, marked declared, never checked. Every absent section is listed with its reason and counted against us. It says what was observed and what was not; it never says who was wronged. If this store is a party to the purchase, the file says so on its face and still assembles. Delivered in the response.