Maps

My rating of this map

Whether the caller may rate this map, on what evidence, and what they already said about it. The gate is the honest part: the vehicle ratings read the caller's record on that exact tank, and nothing can do the same for an arena, because Wargaming publishes no per-arena record for anybody. So this answers with the caller's own account record, how many battles are still missing when they are short, and their existing vote if there is one (including a written opinion still waiting on a moderator, which only its author is shown). Signed out is not an error: it answers signedIn: false so the page can offer the sign-in rather than break. The rating is made under the caller's own Wargaming region, whatever region the page was opened on.

get/{region}/maps/{slug}/ratings/me

Request

  • Base URL: https://unicum.gg/api
  • URL: https://unicum.gg/api/{region}/maps/{slug}/ratings/me
  • Auth: none required

Path parameters

region'eu' | 'na' | 'asia' required

Game server region.

slugstring required

Map slug (e.g. prokhorovka).

Response

Successful response

signedInboolean required
votingRegion'eu' | 'na' | 'asia' nullable required

Game server region.

eligibleboolean required
block'no_record' | 'never_played' | 'too_few_battles' required

Why a signed-in account may not rate this tank yet.

requiredinteger required

Battles on the account before it may rate a map. A weaker claim than the vehicle gate's and deliberately so, since the rotation decides where a player is sent rather than the player.

reviewsOpenboolean required

Whether written opinions are being accepted. False closes the text field and leaves the stars working, since they need no moderation. One answer for the whole site: there is one queue and one moderator.

Changes

No recorded changes to this operation across all 1 revision of this API.