Evaluate an LLM provider's SUITABILITY for legal work (owner-only) · 0 credits
Beyond the connectivity health check (/test): it runs the configured engine against an ADVERSARIAL legal mini-goldset (ES∪EN) and scores it with Nexus's own verification engine. It measures citation anti-fabrication, sense fidelity, instruction following and reliability. Returns { rating, score, dimensions, reliability, recommendation, probes, assessed?, assessedCode?, assessedNote?, scoreCoverage?, unmeasured? }. Owner-only, 0 credits; it re-validates SSRF; errors are sanitized (never an echo of the credential). Configure the provider first (POST /api/v1/llm-providers) and evaluate its {id}. A warn/fail judges the MODEL chosen, not the platform: citation verification runs over the output whatever the engine is.
⚠️ Check assessed before reading rating or score. The scorers detect BAD behaviour (a fabricated citation, an inverted meaning, a broken format), so an engine that returns nothing gives them nothing to catch. A probe with no usable output is NOT scored (probes[].evaluable: false), it leaves its dimension's denominator, and the weight that could not be measured is never credited: score runs out of 100 x scoreCoverage. assessed: false + assessedCode say WHY (engine did not answer / answered empty / partial coverage). An engine that does not answer does not score low — it does not score. Scope: mcp | * (NOT cases).
Request
- Base URL: https://legal.nexusquantum.legal
- URL: https://legal.nexusquantum.legal/api/v1/llm-providers/{id}/suitability
- Auth: HTTP bearer
Path parameters
Response
Suitability report (rating pass|warn|fail + dimensions + recommendation).
Changes
No recorded changes to this operation across all 1 revision of this API.