UK judicial attribution by judgment
Judicial attribution at the level of the JUDGMENT, not the case: a UK appeal produces several judgments, each with its own author and stance (leading / concurring / dissenting / court). There is no reporting judge, and no voto particular — the civil-law separate opinion recorded as such — in common law. Every count ships with its provenance (from_source_metadata / from_text_anchor / from_model) because textual extraction is unevenly available across courts, so a ranking built on it leans toward the formats we parse. Thin loopback to /api/jurimetria/gb/judges. Scope mcp/*.
Request
- Base URL: https://legal.nexusquantum.legal
- URL: https://legal.nexusquantum.legal/api/v1/jurimetria/gb/judges
- Auth: HTTP bearer
Query parameters
United Kingdom forum. Required — there is no default, and omitting it does not mean England. GB means all forums; a specific forum also includes UK-wide courts (the Supreme Court sits above all three), and every row carries its own forum so the split stays visible.
Response
Result. May carry note instead of data when the projection has not been loaded — an empty result is never reported as a zero.
Changes
No recorded changes to this operation across all 1 revision of this API.