Reconcile the direct method (treasury forecast) against the indirect method (derived from the GL), cell by cell over spine x entity x period

Reconcile the direct method (treasury forecast) against the indirect method (derived from the GL), cell by cell over spine x entity x period. This is the thing no ERP or TMS can produce, because neither holds both methods in one grid. It REFUSES to answer when the inputs are not comparable — mixed FX bases, more than one GL version, or only one method present — because a reconciliation whose number cannot be trusted is worse than none. Provable layers are peeled deterministically; narrate only the residual.

post/api/v1/explain_gap

Request

  • Base URL: https://k-phi.com (the document declares no server; this is the origin it was published from)
  • URL: https://k-phi.com/api/v1/explain_gap
  • Auth: HTTP bearer

Request body

tolerancenumber

Absolute amount within which a cell is considered to tie. Default 1.

layersobject

Optional spine -> layer name map. An explained difference becomes a named layer instead of counting as a failure to reconcile.

Response

OK

dataobject

Changes

No recorded changes to this operation across all 1 revision of this API.