What stands behind this memory, and what leans on it
The traceability question in one call: what supports or defeats this memory (acceptance), and which claims would change if this premise were discounted (premise_for).
Two upstream folds, because neither read answers alone — status sees only edges whose to is this memory, impact only those whose from is. A memory used purely as a premise has an EMPTY acceptance and a full premise_for, and a route that shipped only the first would report the most important case as nothing bears on this.
premise_for is ONE HOP. ONE HOP, bounded by D6: these are the refs whose acceptance changes when every edge FROM this premise is discounted. It is NOT the transitive closure — a claim that then loses its own support is not listed here, and computing that chain is consumer policy the kernel deliberately does not make.
An edge is a REASON, with an exact id. Two edges whose prose resembles are two edges and no fold merges them; the fold never reads reason at all, which is why it is required — it is written for the human reading the audit, and nothing else will ever supply it.
There is NO delete. Withdrawing a reason is bottom, an APPEND that leaves the edge, its defeat, and the history of both in the log forever.
An acceptance status is a joint function of TWO logs — the warrant log and the assertion log the verdict oracle reads — so every read carries both cursors. Two answers are comparable only at equal pairs.
contested is in the status vocabulary and CANNOT OCCUR in the current topology: an edge attacks exactly one target, so undercut cycles are closed under their own targets and a support/rebut edge can never be undecided. Do not build a UI state for it.
Requires the coord:read scope. Accepts all three lanes: a session JWT (bounded by the caller's role on this workspace) or an il_* machine credential whose own scope set, workspace set and validity window cover it — both ceilings apply and neither can raise the other, so a credential carrying coord:read is still refused where the role does not permit it.
A credential with no scope record resolves to LEGACY_DEFAULT, which does NOT include coord:read — mint a key with it explicitly (POST /v2/workspaces/{id}/keys).
Request
- Base URL: https://api.infolang.ai
- URL: https://api.infolang.ai/v2/workspaces/{id}/memories/{memoryId}/warrant
- Auth: one of:
- HTTP bearer
- HTTP bearer
- HTTP bearer
Path parameters
Response
Acceptance, one-hop impact, and what each of them could not see
Changes
No recorded changes to this operation across all 1 revision of this API.