Cross-jurisdiction comparison — what does every state say about X?
One row per jurisdiction holding law in a branch or subcategory, with record counts, how many are in force, the split by instrument type, the latest effective date and when we last verified it. This is the answer you would otherwise have to page the entire 31,867-record corpus to assemble.
COUNTING. records counts EVERY domain assignment, primary or secondary; records_primary counts only records whose PRIMARY classification is this branch. Both are reported because they differ a lot (health_law: 2,852 vs 1,942) and a comparison built on primary assignments alone would report that a state has no privacy law when its privacy statutes happen to be filed under consumer protection first.
TIER. Ordinary single-field filtering on /us-law is open at every tier including keyless — discovery is never the thing that is metered. This is the assembled answer, so below Pro it returns a real 5-jurisdiction SAMPLE with the true totals stated in meta, and the full table at Pro and above on either product ladder.
Request
- Base URL: https://ai-law-tracker.com/api/v1
- URL: https://ai-law-tracker.com/api/v1/us-law/compare
- Auth: one of:
- none
- API key in header X-API-Key
- HTTP bearer
Query parameters
Branch id from /us-law/taxonomy. Either branch or domain is required.
Subcategory id, for a narrower comparison. Mutually exclusive with branch.
Only jurisdictions holding at least one operative record.
Response
One row per jurisdiction, most records first.
Changes
No recorded changes to this operation across all 1 revision of this API.