---
title: "UK judicial attribution by judgment"
method: GET
path: "/api/v1/jurimetria/gb/judges"
tags: ["Jurimetrics"]
---

# UK judicial attribution by judgment

`GET /api/v1/jurimetria/gb/judges`

## Request

- Base URL: `https://legal.nexusquantum.legal`
- URL: `https://legal.nexusquantum.legal/api/v1/jurimetria/gb/judges`
- Auth: HTTP bearer

Judicial attribution at the level of the JUDGMENT, not the case: a UK appeal produces several judgments, each with its own author and `stance` (leading / concurring / dissenting / court). There is no reporting judge, and no `voto particular` — the civil-law separate opinion recorded as such — in common law. Every count ships with its provenance (`from_source_metadata` / `from_text_anchor` / `from_model`) because textual extraction is unevenly available across courts, so a ranking built on it leans toward the formats we parse. Thin loopback to `/api/jurimetria/gb/judges`. Scope `mcp`/`*`.

## Query parameters

- `jurisdiction` 'GB' | 'GB-EAW' | 'GB-WLS' | 'GB-SCT' | 'GB-NIR', required
- `limit` integer

## Response `200`

Result. May carry `note` instead of data when the projection has not been loaded — an empty result is never reported as a zero.

- object

## Other responses

- `400`: MISSING_JURISDICTION or WRONG_JURISDICTION (non-UK code).
- `401`: Invalid API key.
- `403`: INSUFFICIENT_SCOPE.
- `429`: RATE_LIMITED

---

[API](https://skmtc.dev/nexusquantum/apis/nexus-legal-api.md) · [All operations](https://skmtc.dev/nexusquantum/apis/nexus-legal-api/llms.txt) · [OpenAPI document](https://skmtc.dev/nexusquantum/apis/nexus-legal-api/revisions/4084d8d4eb0b?raw)